If you aren't paying attention to Arizona...

[Tbeck]

[hillsy v2]

BOMBSHELL REPORT: Testimony at Arizona Senate Elections Committee Reveals Evidence that THREE OF THE FIVE Maricopa County Supervisors have recorded documents EVIDENCING the acceptance of bribes..

MEDIA SILENT..

Haha - more loony fantasy....

In perhaps the most bizarre presentation given to the committee so far this year, Gilbert insurance agent Jacqueline Breger accused Gov. Katie Hobbs, several of the Maricopa County Supervisors, 12 Maricopa County Superior Court judges and the mayor of Mesa of taking bribes from the Sinaloa drug cartel in the form of money laundered through a housing deed scam. She also accused the legislators themselves of being on the take.

She said in her Feb. 23 presentation to a joint meeting of the House and Senate elections committees that the bribery scheme also included election fraud in Maricopa County.

Breger did not provide any evidence to back up her claims, except to point to a book soon to be released by John Thaler, a Valley attorney and her boyfriend. During the committee meeting, Breger repeatedly mentioned a woman who had tipped Thaler off to the supposed racketeering scheme, but she failed to mention that woman was Thaler’s ex-wife, who he claims kidnapped their son.

https://www.azmirror.com/2023/02/24/ari ... spiracies/

[hillsy v2]

What a surprise

Kari Lake's lawyers fined for false claims about Arizona election

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65494139

[Designer]

BOMBSHELL REPORT: Testimony at Arizona Senate Elections Committee Reveals Evidence that THREE OF THE FIVE Maricopa County Supervisors have recorded documents EVIDENCING the acceptance of bribes..
MEDIA SILENT..

As time does,...the FACTS come out that support this presentation.


The Swamp Strikes Back
By Dennis Lund June 20, 2023

On February 23rd, of this year, Jaqueline Breger, the principal investigator for Harris/Thaler Law Corporation, at the invitation of State Representative Liz Harris (R), made a presentation to a joint committee for the state of Arizona on Municipal Oversight and Elections, which was shocking in scope and magnitude of both the various levels of statewide corruption and election fraud.

The report presented was assembled under the direction of John Harris Thaler, Senior Attorney in charge of investigations, who has specialized in racketeering and corruption for over 30 years. His five-man team, which has participated in some of the largest investigations of racketeering and public corruption both in the U.S. and Mexico, also draws in various experts, or advisors in multiple disciplines, as may be required, for specific aspects of investigations.

In the presentation and supporting documentation, Breger named names of those who benefited from the corruption, which was laid out in some considerable detail. More specifically, forty people are listed on page 85 of the 96-page document, as being the beneficiary of fraudulent second trust deeds. Such deeds are issued by shell companies with no expectations of the deeds being paid back. Many of those names are those of people holding elected office, on the committee or well known to those on that committee. If the information contained was false, then the presenter and Thaler have opened themselves up to litigation. Yet no such litigation has been filed or threatened.

The natural tendency of the guilty is to vociferously proclaim their innocence, while simultaneously circling the wagons to protect themselves and their grubstakes.

In reviewing some of the hit pieces written regarding the presentation, there was at least one common thread: “no evidence” was presented was often repeated. This was clearly not true to anyone who reviewed the 96 pages of the report that was given to the committee.

One example of the evidence contained was the deposition on page 28 of one Richard Salazar, who under penalty of perjury stated that he saw multiple boxes of ballots and cash delivered from a private residence in Tempe, to Runbeck Election Services, the company hired by Maricopa County to assist in the counting of absentee ballots.

[hillsy v2]

The Swamp Strikes Back
By Dennis Lund June 20, 2023

On February 23rd, of this year, Jaqueline Breger, the principal investigator for Harris/Thaler Law Corporation, at the invitation of State Representative Liz Harris (R), made a presentation to a joint committee for the state of Arizona on Municipal Oversight and Elections, which was shocking in scope and magnitude of both the various levels of statewide corruption and election fraud.

Breger again? Wonder how the boyfriend's book is going??

Breger did not provide any evidence to back up her claims, except to point to a book soon to be released by John Thaler, a Valley attorney and her boyfriend. During the committee meeting, Breger repeatedly mentioned a woman who had tipped Thaler off to the supposed racketeering scheme, but she failed to mention that woman was Thaler’s ex-wife, who he claims kidnapped their son.

[Designer]

Breger did not provide any evidence to back up her claims, except to point to a book soon to be released by John Thaler, a Valley attorney and her boyfriend.

The Swamp Strikes Back
By Dennis Lund June 20, 2023

In the presentation and supporting documentation, Breger named names of those who benefited from the corruption, which was laid out in some considerable detail. More specifically, forty people are listed on page 85 of the 96-page document, as being the beneficiary of fraudulent second trust deeds. Such deeds are issued by shell companies with no expectations of the deeds being paid back. Many of those names are those of people holding elected office, on the committee or well known to those on that committee. If the information contained was false, then the presenter and Thaler have opened themselves up to litigation. Yet no such litigation has been filed or threatened.

[hillsy v2]

Spruiking sales for the book then??

[RoadKing]

Aint paying attention.

[hillsy v2]

Aint paying attention.

That's because there's nothing to see.

Unless you want to buy a book by some nutbag loony.

[Designer]

Aint paying attention.

That's because there's nothing to see.

Mr. ASSHOLE? What we see is that you are Ignorant,...and are NOT paying attention either.

The Swamp Strikes Back
By Dennis Lund June 20, 2023
In the presentation and supporting documentation, Breger named names of those who benefited from the corruption, which was laid out in some considerable detail. More specifically, forty people are listed on page 85 of the 96-page document, as being the beneficiary of fraudulent second trust deeds. Such deeds are issued by shell companies with no expectations of the deeds being paid back. Many of those names are those of people holding elected office, on the committee or well known to those on that committee. If the information contained was false, then the presenter and Thaler have opened themselves up to litigation. Yet no such litigation has been filed ...or threatened.

The natural tendency of the guilty is to vociferously proclaim their innocence, while simultaneously circling the wagons to protect themselves and their grubstakes.

In reviewing some of the hit pieces written regarding the presentation, there was at least one common thread: “no evidence” was presented was often repeated. This was clearly not true to anyone who reviewed the 96 pages of the report that was given to the committee.

One example of the evidence contained was the deposition on page 28 of one Richard Salazar, who under penalty of perjury stated that he saw multiple boxes of ballots and cash delivered from a private residence in Tempe, to Runbeck Election Services, the company hired by Maricopa County to assist in the counting of absentee ballots.

[hillsy v2]

So your rationale for this claim being true is that no one has filed for defamation against it?

That's kinda like how you work on this forum, eh? You post rubbish, no one refutes it, so you repost or quote yourself and then it's "fact"....

[hillsy v2]

Kari Lake Declares Herself New Leader of the Wagner Group

PHOENIX (The Borowitz Report)—The situation in Russia descended into further uncertainty after Kari Lake stunned geopolitical experts by declaring herself the new leader of the Wagner Group.

Speaking from the mercenary force’s new headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona, the former anchorwoman claimed that she won the leadership of Wagner by a landslide.

She warned Russian state media against questioning her claim to the Wagner helm. “I will be your worst frickin’ nightmare,” she said.

Wagner troops expressed surprise at Lake’s sudden elevation and reservations about whether she would be an improvement over their former leader, Yevgeny Prigozhin. “She seems really mean,” one said.

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowit ... gner-group

[Designer]

So your rationale for this claim being true is that no one has filed for defamation against it? .

Umm,. Mr. Butt-hurt? That has MUCH MORE weight than your feces-laden CRAP saying it isn't.

[hillsy v2]

So your rationale for this claim being true is that no one has filed for defamation against it? .

Umm,. Mr. Butt-hurt? That has MUCH MORE weight than your feces-laden CRAP saying it isn't.

I guess there's the EVIDENCE thing...or the LACK THEREOF at this point....

Breger did not provide any evidence to back up her claims, except to point to a book soon to be released by John Thaler, a Valley attorney and her boyfriend. During the committee meeting, Breger repeatedly mentioned a woman who had tipped Thaler off to the supposed racketeering scheme, but she failed to mention that woman was Thaler’s ex-wife, who he claims kidnapped their son.

[Designer]

I guess there's the EVIDENCE thing...or the LACK THEREOF at this point....

Breger did not provide any evidence to back up her claims, except to point to a book soon to be released by John Thaler, a Valley attorney and her boyfriend. During the committee meeting, Breger repeatedly mentioned a woman who had tipped Thaler off to the supposed racketeering scheme, but she failed to mention that woman was Thaler’s ex-wife, who he claims kidnapped their son.

Hey Butt-HOLE. That there wasn't evidence provided AT THAT TIME ,..does not mean there is not any evidence.

IN FACT,...there is the promise of said-same EVIDENCE forthcoming.

What speaks louder is this; (highlighted in red,so your tiny little SHITHEAD can find it)

The Swamp Strikes Back
By Dennis Lund June 20, 2023
In the presentation and supporting documentation, Breger named names of those who benefited from the corruption, which was laid out in some considerable detail. More specifically, forty people are listed on page 85 of the 96-page document, as being the beneficiary of fraudulent second trust deeds. Such deeds are issued by shell companies with no expectations of the deeds being paid back. Many of those names are those of people holding elected office, on the committee or well known to those on that committee. If the information contained was false, then the presenter and Thaler have opened themselves up to litigation. Yet no such litigation has been filed ...or threatened.

The natural tendency of the guilty is to vociferously proclaim their innocence, while simultaneously circling the wagons to protect themselves and their grubstakes.

In reviewing some of the hit pieces written regarding the presentation, there was at least one common thread: “no evidence” was presented was often repeated. This was clearly not true to anyone who reviewed the 96 pages of the report that was given to the committee.

.....Oh!,...and this.......

[hillsy v2]

I'm guessing no litigation was filed or threatened because no one fucking read the document.

Why would you give creedence to a fkn loony? Oh wait - that's in YOUR radar....

[Designer]

I'm guessing no litigation was filed or threatened because no one fucking read the document.

Possible,...but not probable.
You are just Sofa King fulla SHIT that you can't face those evidences pointed out.

[hillsy v2]

I'm guessing no litigation was filed or threatened because no one fucking read the document.

Possible,...but not probable.
You are just Sofa King fulla SHIT that you can't face those evidences pointed out.

What "evidences" do you have again? Some documents no one read?

Fkn compelling

[Designer]

I'm guessing no litigation was filed or threatened because no one fucking read the document.

Possible,...but not probable. You are just Sofa King fulla SHIT that you can't face those evidences pointed out.

What "evidences" do you have again? Some documents no one read?

Hey Shit Head,...if they didn't read it,....how can you say what it contains isn't evidence,....shit head.

[hillsy v2]

Oh dear - you're confusing yourself now....